News

Press conference, public hearing draws a crowd

Environmental, Sound Rivers, Tar-Pamlico Watershed, Water Quality

Posted on November 21st, 2024

A large crowd of Blounts Creek-lovers came out Tuesday to speak out against the renewal of a mining company’s wastewater discharge permit — a permit that could potentially destroy the creek’s entire ecosystem.

The event was held at Beaufort County Community College’s conference center in Washington and kicked off with a Sound Rivers press conference at 5 p.m., followed by a public hearing at 6 p.m.

Read Sound Rivers Executive Director Heather Deck and Pamlico-Tar Riverkeeper Katey Zimmerman’s comments below.

“The public hearing went as well as we could have hoped for,” said Pamlico-Tar Riverkeeper Katey Zimmerman. “The Blounts Creek community showed up in impressive numbers and made well-informed, impactful comments against the issuance of Martin Marietta’s permit. We did exactly what we had to do. Now we’ll wait on DEQs decision and get prepared for next steps.”

Pamlico-Tar Riverkeeper Katey Zimmerman prepares to welcome attendees to the Sound Rivers press conference.

Katey led off the press conference, followed by Sound Rivers Executive Director Heather Deck, Southern Environmental Law Center senior attorney Blakely Hildebrand, Mary Ellen Hunter, regional director of Coastal Conservation Association, Dr. Bobby Bowser, lab and field manager of East Carolina University’s Water Resources Center, and wrapping up with Bob Daw, Blounts Creek resident and co-founder of the grassroots Save Blounts Creek movement.

Each delved into the many facets of the 13-year-long Blounts Creek saga: the history of how a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit was issued by the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality’s Division of Water Resources to Martin Marietta Materials for a 649-acre limestone-mining quarry; the Sound Rivers lawsuit that bounced around the North Carolina court system for a decade; the possible impacts of 12 million gallons of freshwater being discharged each day into the brackish waters of Blounts Creek; baseline monitoring that’s being done now to determine those impacts; and the passion with which Blounts Creek residents have advocated for the creek for more than a decade.

Local media outlets WITN, WCTI, WNCT, the Greenville Daily Reflector and the Washington Daily News covered the press conference and hearing.

Adelaide Stiles, the youngest attendee to the public hearing, is interviewed by a WITN reporter.

“Since 2011, numerous state agencies have commented on the impact of such a discharge to Blounts Creek,” Heather told the assembled press. “The North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries and Wildlife Resources Commission both noted how special Blounts Creek is to eastern NC fisheries and that the creek is a widely used resource by the public. Blounts Creek maintains a vibrant, diverse and healthy population of both freshwater and saltwater fish species. Both resource agencies objected to the permitted discharge proposed in DEQ’s permit due to the harm they note is likely to occur from the wastewater discharge of this magnitude.  

“Sound Rivers and the Blounts Creek residents are here again tonight, because the department, through the release of its draft wastewater discharge permit and intent to issue a permit for 12 million gallons per day, has failed to protect the integrity of a beloved waterway. Sound Rivers is proud to stand with local residents as we advocate for protection of Blounts Creek.”

Public hearing attendees hold aloft their signs at the request of NCDEQ staff.

Following the press conference, approximately 130 people filled the conference room where Derek Denard, environmental program consultant with DWR’s NPDES Permitting Program, gave an overview of the permit Martin Marietta applied to renew after the North Carolina Supreme Court ruled in September 2023 that NCDEQ was correct to issue permit. The permit — good for five years — expired in 2018.

The renewal prompted a letter-writing campaign, the success of which determined NCDEQ hold a public hearing. Nearly 500 letters were sent, requesting that the permit not be issued.

Derek Denard explains the permit application details.

Paul Wojoski, North Carolina Division of Water Resources section chief of Water Quality Permitting, led the hearing, and 26 speakers, including Katey and Heather, current Sound Rivers board member Betsy Hester, Dr. Ernie Larkin, one the founders of Pamlico-Tar River Foundation (Sound Rivers’ founding organization), and many Blounts Creek residents, many of whom also spoke at the original public hearing in 2012. Topics covered the loss of what the state has designated a nursery for saltwater species, property values, erosion, operation of wells, the collapse of an ecosystem that could force all wildlife to abandon the creek, loss of income from recreational fishing, and more.

The decision about the permit renewal will be announced in 90 days, according to Wojoski.

My name is Katey Zimmerman. I am here tonight in my role as the Pamlico Tar Riverkeeper for Sound Rivers — a nonprofit organization with over 2,500 members that protects and advocates for the health of the Neuse and Tar-Pamlico rivers and as a resident of Beaufort County. Sound Rivers has already submitted robust technical comments opposing the renewal of this permit, which you may refer to.

I’m here tonight to support the local community members that live in the Blounts Creek watershed, who will be directly impacted by this decision. Many of these residents have been advocating for over a decade for the protection of Blounts Creek- and are here again tonight asking you to do the right thing and to use the full power and authority you have under the Clean Water Act, to protect the creek and fulfill your mandate under NC law.

*DWR can only issue a permit for a discharge if it reasonably ensures that the discharge will not violate Clean Water Act requirements. This draft permit does not.

Experts have consistently testified throughout this permitting process that dumping that volume into the headwaters of Blounts Creek will permanently change the creek…It will turn a coastal plain stream into something that looks nothing like a coastal plain stream.

*The North Carolina division of Marine fisheries submitted technical comments to DWR, explicitly stating that they “object to the subject project” due to the “potential and unknown impacts of the discharge on one of the only few remaining areas in the Pamlico known to be supporting river herring, as well as impacts to other estuarine and anadromous fish species.”

Martin Marietta themselves acknowledged in its permit application that the effects of its discharge would change the creek in ways that would no longer support its existing diversity of fish.

Despite the last ruling, we firmly maintain that these changes are not allowable under the Clean Water Act’s standard for biological integrity, standards for swamp waters, and the antidegradation rule. This permit must not be renewed without significant alterations.

If you do allow this discharge, we are not going anywhere. Sound Rivers and our partners will continue to do our own monitoring, so we ask you- please use your authority and include clear language in the permit that allows you to alter or revoke this permit when Martin Marietta’s discharge inevitably begins compromising the biological integrity of Blounts Creek.

I first learned of the proposed mine and discharge permit in 2011, when I was the then Pamlico-Tar Riverkeeper for Sound Rivers. Now, as the executive director, I have stood for almost 15 years with the residents of Blounts Creek who have asked the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality for reasonable and available alternatives to the mine wastewater discharge —  alternatives that were never fully vetted by the agency or the company. You have heard tonight the many stories of why a healthy and natural Blounts Creek is important to the local residents and the economy of our county. You have heard from our Riverkeeper that the permit does not comply with the requirements of the Clean Water Act, is not enforceable in any meaningful way and fails to protect the integrity of a healthy and vibrant Blounts Creek. 

I know that DEQ has been systematically diminished and underfunded by the North Carolina General Assembly, attacked by big business, undermined by the state courts — I understand the struggle you have faced.

If ever there was a time and place to take a stand against those that would seek to turn you from a regulatory agency to simply a permitting agency for business and industry, it’s now. These residents have waited for almost 15 years for you to do the right thing and to use the regulatory authority under the Clean Water Act, state law and the intent of the state’s Constitution to protect Blounts Creek. Now is the time to advocate for the natural environment you are supposed to protect, not protect the economic interest of big business that seeks to profit from it at the expense of local residents. You do that — you use your authority to do the right thing — and we, the community, will stand with you.

Related News

Washington gets trash trap No. 10 December 5th 2024
Southern Nash gets rain garden, cistern installs December 5th 2024
Riverkeeper follows up on red-flagged Swim Guide site December 5th 2024
Riverkeeper, intern tackle Lick Creek sampling November 27th 2024
Washington to get Trash Trap No. 10 November 27th 2024
Durham community turns out for development ordinance update November 21st 2024